I have said it before but it bears emphasizing: when I write my academic advice book, if I ever do, it will not take as its point of departure the idea that the reader lacks discipline or does not know how to work. My book will not be a self-improvement book. It will be about pleasure and gathering information and making informed decisions.
Meanwhile I learned from Facebook that academic career success is now defined as having a patchwork of adjunct jobs, and that professors actually promote this vision. Who is calling deprofessionalization, career success?
It does occur to me, though, that perhaps the reason the adjuncts and post-acs are as convinced they must stay in academia as they appear to be, is the “professionalization” that was brought in in the 1980s as part of graduate training. I know from my experience that once you go on the job market, you get a lot of pressure from everyone you know to only consider academic jobs. But I did not get that from graduate school, and now apparently many do.
Did “professionalization” (I am not sure what it was) mean having a certain kind of Kool-Aid forced down your throat earlier? Of course it does, and we have discussed this before.
Axé.
Also in my advice book: people should seek pleasure and self determination, and believe in their projects. As opposed to require discipline and second guess themselves, watch their backs and figure out what orders to take.