World’s fattest revision request

I’ve already written them back but I wanted to send a postscript, and desisted. I had said: to focus more on coloniality/decoloniality I can’t JUST do Ferreira da Silva. And that I couldn’t see talking about these things without at least referring to Gilmore’s work.

I didn’t say, but am now thinking, hm, maybe I should make this a Louisiana Studies paper. But anyway, what they seem to want is an entirely different piece, and I’m just not convinced about all of this.

Axé.


2 thoughts on “World’s fattest revision request

  1. Yes, that would be normal. But it was written for a volume that fell apart, and then requested by this special edition of a journal. I’m rereading it and it is telegraphic. Also it’s a carceral studies, not a literature piece. Originally it was for carceral studies people and it is very sociological. The ones who requested it are law-literature-global south. So it’s like: I don’t quite know what I’m doing, and they also don’t, but maybe I should work with them. I’m going to talk on the phone. But this is going to be more work than planned, that’s for sure … possibly it would be no matter what … so for NOW I’m going with the idea of at least having my foot in the door

Leave a comment